BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174939)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
    Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi SN; Baumgartner TA; Elliott R
    J Athl Train; 2007; 42(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18174939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
    MacDonald J; Duerson D
    Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
    Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?
    Resch J; Driscoll A; McCaffrey N; Brown C; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi S; Baumgartner T; Walpert K
    J Athl Train; 2013; 48(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 23724770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
    Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
    Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.
    Farnsworth JL; Dargo L; Ragan BG; Kang M
    J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):826-833. PubMed ID: 28771032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
    Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools (CNTs): Reliability and Validity for the Assessment of Sport-Related Concussion.
    Nelson LD; LaRoche AA; Pfaller AY; Lerner EB; Hammeke TA; Randolph C; Barr WB; Guskiewicz K; McCrea MA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Jan; 22(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 26714883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
    Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
    Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
    Brett BL; Solomon GS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balance Assessment in Sports-Related Concussion: Evaluating Test-Retest Reliability of the Equilibrate System.
    Odom MJ; Lee YM; Zuckerman SL; Apple RP; Germanos T; Solomon GS; Sills AK
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2016; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 27518293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population.
    Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the suitability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) computerized neurocognitive battery for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning.
    Elbin RJ; Fazio-Sumrok V; Anderson MN; D'Amico NR; Said A; Grossel A; Schatz P; Lipinski D; Womble M
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():138-141. PubMed ID: 30472342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a simple test of reaction time for baseline concussion testing in a population of high school athletes.
    MacDonald J; Wilson J; Young J; Duerson D; Swisher G; Collins CL; Meehan WP
    Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24727576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric and measurement properties of concussion assessment tools in youth sports.
    Valovich McLeod TC; Barr WB; McCrea M; Guskiewicz KM
    J Athl Train; 2006; 41(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 17273465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concussion history is not a predictor of computerised neurocognitive performance.
    Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Piland SG; Anderson RB; Collie A
    Br J Sports Med; 2006 Sep; 40(9):802-5; discussion 802-5. PubMed ID: 16929049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
    Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-Retest Reliability and Interpretation of Common Concussion Assessment Tools: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.
    Broglio SP; Katz BP; Zhao S; McCrea M; McAllister T;
    Sports Med; 2018 May; 48(5):1255-1268. PubMed ID: 29138991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-Retest Reliability of the King-Devick Test in an Adolescent Population.
    Oberlander TJ; Olson BL; Weidauer L
    J Athl Train; 2017 May; 52(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 28362161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.