These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1817522)

  • 1. An in vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of a porcelain inlay system.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cramer A; Wilson NH; Roulet JF; Noack M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 1817522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effect of modified forms of preparation on the quality of SR Isosit composite inlay margins].
    Hannig M; Weinle S; Albers HK
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):611-4. PubMed ID: 1817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
    LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal integrity in ceramic inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Sertgöz A; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1996 Sep; 2(2-3):465-9. PubMed ID: 9569799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; Scampa U; Campanile G; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 7568723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Marginal fit of ceramic and composite inlays in vitro].
    Reich E; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 2269072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.