These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Differences of practical relevance between DC and AC dental X-ray units]. Benz C; Schwarz P; Sonnabend E Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Nov; 43(11):1162-5. PubMed ID: 3251733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality assessment and medical physics evaluation of different portable dental X-ray units. Pittayapat P; Oliveira-Santos C; Thevissen P; Michielsen K; Bergans N; Willems G; Debruyckere D; Jacobs R Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):112-7. PubMed ID: 20554135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [X-ray diagnostic apparatus in dentistry (a review)]. Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM Med Tekh; 2000; (5):40-4. PubMed ID: 11076365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of bite-wing entrance surface exposures for dental X-ray generators. Holloway AF; McFarlane DJ Ont Dent; 1984 Feb; 61(2):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 6591105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new approach to dosimetry of dental x-ray machines. Miller MS; Kittleman WV J Colo Dent Assoc; 1975 Jan; 53(2):39-44. PubMed ID: 1062391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems. Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of radiation doses received from constant direct current and conventional self-rectified panoramic dental x-ray equipment. Forest D; Deschamps M; Normandeau L J Dent Que; 1981; 18():9-17. PubMed ID: 6945322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiation load of patients and professional personnel during pantomography with Cranex DC x-ray machine]. Taschner P; Rother U; Landeck E; Tetzlaff W; Edelmann BU Stomatol DDR; 1984 May; 34(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 6591583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Significant results of an information survey of radiation doses of dental equipment in the United States, 1973-1976. The DENT-program: (Dental Exposure Normalization Technique)]. Crabtree CL Med Hyg (Geneve); 1981 Oct; 39(1440):3317-23. PubMed ID: 6948150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A survey of all dental x-ray machines in British Columbia using TLD chips 1981-83. Morley DR; Greene MW; McConchie JM; Gray AS J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 51(9):683-7. PubMed ID: 3902173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Construction of an electronic dental X-ray timer. Heimansohn H J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1979; 58(5):23-5. PubMed ID: 297085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiation physics and radiation hygiene using dental x-ray units. The dental x-ray unit. II]. Johansen J Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 Nov; 83(10):429-34. PubMed ID: 4519154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Alberta x-ray protection program. Wetherill JM J Can Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 47(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 7026000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with measurement of X-ray exposure time on pulsed dental X-ray units. Jacobson A; Kelly M; Farman A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 May; 19(2):87. PubMed ID: 2079149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]