These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18176807)

  • 1. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?
    Punwani S; Halligan S; Irving P; Bloom S; Bungay A; Greenhalgh R; Godbold J; Taylor SA; Altman DG
    Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):874-81. PubMed ID: 18176807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study.
    Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
    Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
    Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Altman DG; Atkin W; Bartram C; Fenlon H; Laghi A; Stoker J; Taylor S; Frost R; Dessey G; De Villiers M; Florie J; Foley S; Honeyfield L; Iannaccone R; Gallo T; Kay C; Lefere P; Lowe A; Mangiapane F; Marrannes J; Neri E; Nieddu G; Nicholson D; O'Hare A; Ori S; Politi B; Poulus M; Regge D; Renaut L; Rudralingham V; Signoretta S; Vagli P; Van der Hulst V; Williams-Butt J
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1737-44. PubMed ID: 16636803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography.
    van Wijk C; Florie J; Nio CY; Dekker E; de Vries AH; Venema HW; van Vliet LJ; Stoker J; Vos FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1279-85. PubMed ID: 18430844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of different window settings on colon polyp measurements with CT virtual colonoscopy: a phantom study.
    Wu XW; Wang WQ; Xu JM; Liu B
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21724119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
    Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
    Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.