These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18177063)

  • 1. Effects of level and background noise on interaural time difference discrimination for transposed stimuli.
    Dreyer AA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 18177063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities conveyed by high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones and high-frequency transposed tones: effects of spectrally flanking noises.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3088-94. PubMed ID: 19045794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.
    Dreyer A; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 96(5):2327-41. PubMed ID: 16807349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of stimulus type and frequency.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15072523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical assessment of the level-dependent representation of high-frequency spectral notches in the peripheral auditory system.
    Alves-Pinto A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):409-21. PubMed ID: 18646986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates.
    Riquelme R; Kuwada S; Filipovic B; Hartung K; Leonard G
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 16518139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency and level dependent masking of the multiple auditory steady-state response in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Branstetter BK; Finneran JJ; Houser DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2928-35. PubMed ID: 18529209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Responses of neurons in the cochlear nuclei of sharp-eared bats to presentation of simultaneous ultrasonic stimuli].
    Vasil'ev AG; Vinogradova EP
    Neirofiziologiia; 1978; 10(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 673072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeners' sensitivity to "onset/offset" and "ongoing" interaural delays in high-frequency, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.
    Buell TN; Griffin SJ; Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 18177158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of level on the discrimination of harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones at high frequencies.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3206-12. PubMed ID: 21568422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Both frequency and interaural delay affect event-related potential responses to binaural gap.
    Huang Y; Kong L; Fan S; Wu X; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1673-8. PubMed ID: 18806687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral composition of concurrent noise affects neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences of tones in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus.
    Siveke I; Leibold C; Grothe B
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2705-15. PubMed ID: 17699697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus frequency, level, and duration on auditory temporal ordering.
    Parker RM; Kasten RN; McCroskey RL; Hoyer EA
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 7185814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences.
    Thompson ER; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1017-29. PubMed ID: 18247904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.