These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18177063)

  • 21. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal damping in response to broadband noise. II. Auditory nerve.
    Joris PX; Louage DH; van der Heijden M
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 99(4):1942-52. PubMed ID: 18272875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal properties of responses to broadband noise in the auditory nerve.
    Louage DH; van der Heijden M; Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 91(5):2051-65. PubMed ID: 15069097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.
    Francart T; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2826-31. PubMed ID: 18189572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of omni-directional noise-exposure during hearing onset and age on auditory spatial resolution in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) -- a behavioral approach.
    Maier JK; Kindermann T; Grothe B; Klump GM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():47-57. PubMed ID: 18343357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of spectral and nonspectral frequency difference limens for human and nonhuman primates.
    Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2124-9. PubMed ID: 8473625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extents of laterality and binaural interference effects.
    Heller LM; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3632-7. PubMed ID: 8655795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Problem of evaluation of impulse noise by the impulse-background criterion].
    Arakelian AG
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1991; (2):25-7. PubMed ID: 2055540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lateralization of high-frequency pure tones with interaural phase difference and bone conduction.
    Rowan D; Gray M
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):404-11. PubMed ID: 18574778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhanced signal detectability in comodulated noise introduced by compression.
    Buschermöhle M; Feudel U; Freund JA
    Biol Cybern; 2008 Dec; 99(6):491-502. PubMed ID: 18810486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1026-36. PubMed ID: 12243151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of two procedural modifications of the frequency of false-alarm responses during pure-tone threshold determination.
    Dancer JE; Conn M
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jul; 23(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 6680723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interference in detection of interaural delay in a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone produced by a second, spectrally remote sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone.
    Heller LM; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1808-16. PubMed ID: 7699162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.
    Pienkowski M; Hagerman B
    Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):107-15. PubMed ID: 19345257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Similar patterns of learning and performance variability for human discrimination of interaural time differences at high and low frequencies.
    Zhang Y; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2207-16. PubMed ID: 17471734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gaussian-noise discrimination and its relation to auditory object formation.
    Goossens T; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3882-93. PubMed ID: 19507971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 17694859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.