These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18177784)

  • 1. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
    Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
    Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
    Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
    Atkinson AC
    Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies with group treatments required special power calculations, allocation methods, and statistical analyses.
    Faes MC; Reelick MF; Perry M; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 21856120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Hoogendoorn EH; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Dec; 26(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 16226925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials.
    Stigsby B; Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 20004741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
    Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
    J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
    Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.