These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

24 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18177961)

  • 1. Predicting Neural Response Latency of the Human Early Visual Cortex from MRI-Based Tissue Measurements of the Optic Radiation.
    Takemura H; Yuasa K; Amano K
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32424054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Movement planning and reprogramming in individuals with autism.
    Nazarali N; Glazebrook CM; Elliott D
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2009 Oct; 39(10):1401-11. PubMed ID: 19466535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociation of summation and peak latencies in visual processing: an MEG study on stimulus eccentricity.
    Zhou B; Bao Y; Sander T; Trahms L; Pöppel E
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Oct; 483(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 20674677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing of early activity in the visual cortex as revealed by simultaneous MEG and ERG recordings.
    Inui K; Sannan H; Miki K; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):239-44. PubMed ID: 16310379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-following and connectivity of different visual areas in response to contrast-reversal stimulation.
    Stephen JM; Ranken DF; Aine CJ
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 18(4):257-72. PubMed ID: 16845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task.
    Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancy between reaction time and visual evoked magnetic response latency under priming.
    Hashimoto A; Inui K; Watanabe S; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Mar; 60(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 18177961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No doubt about offset latency.
    Bair W
    Vis Neurosci; 2004; 21(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 15683555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal magnetoencephalography: current progress and trends.
    Preissl H; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
    Exp Neurol; 2004 Nov; 190 Suppl 1():S28-36. PubMed ID: 15498539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of various stimulation conditions on the P2 latency of the visual evoked potential].
    Cammann R; Gierow W
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol Beih; 1988; 39():66-9. PubMed ID: 3150093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Mapping With Magnetoencephalography: An Update on the Current State of Clinical Research and Practice With Considerations for Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Zillgitt A; Barkley GL; Bowyer SM
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Nov; 37(6):585-591. PubMed ID: 33165231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.