These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18178339)

  • 21. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.
    Pierrel R; Blue S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of responding maintained under second-order schedules of intramuscular cocaine injection or food presentation in squirrel monkeys.
    Katz JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 117071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interresponse-time sensitivity during discrete-trial and free-operant concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Cleaveland JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):317-39. PubMed ID: 10605102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response-rate differences in variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules: An old problem revisited.
    Cole MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):441-51. PubMed ID: 16812732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.
    Rilling M; Caplan HJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 1167899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The copyist model of response emission.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):759-78. PubMed ID: 22673925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions.
    Mingote S; Weber SM; Ishiwari K; Correa M; Salamone JD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 21(6):1749-57. PubMed ID: 15845103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Waiting in pigeons: the effects of daily intercalation on temporal discrimination.
    Wynne CD; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 1645101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops.
    McDowell JJ; Wixted JT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Nov; 46(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 3805974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Polydipsia induced in rats by second-order schedules of reinforcement.
    Corfield-Sumner PK; Blackman DE; Stainer G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 856930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Serial conditional discrimination and temporal bisection in rats selectively lesioned in the dentate gyrus.
    Bueno JL; Bueno Júnior LS
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 21335071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus control of behavioral history.
    Freeman TJ; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 1548448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.
    Reed P; Soh M; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Shek WY
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bouts of responding on variable-interval schedules: effects of deprivation level.
    Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Mar; 81(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 15239490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules.
    Tullis C; Walters G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 5645870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reinforcement frequency, but not gender, determines sensitivity to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.
    Craft RM; Morgan CL; Bernal SA
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Jul; 9(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 10065924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.
    Sealey DM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Foster TM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16156135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.