These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18178350)

  • 1. Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.
    Pfingst BE; Burkholder-Juhasz RA; Zwolan TA; Xu L
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):172-83. PubMed ID: 18178350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds.
    Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3908-15. PubMed ID: 21682413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.
    Bonham BH; Litvak LM
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 18501539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Zhou N; Pfingst BE
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24225651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraneural stimulation for auditory prosthesis: modiolar trunk and intracranial stimulation sites.
    Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):52-63. PubMed ID: 18485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array.
    Hillman T; Badi AN; Normann RA; Kertesz T; Shelton C
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 14501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Zhou N; Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):994-1008. PubMed ID: 22894220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays.
    Allitt BJ; Morgan SJ; Bell S; Nayagam DA; Arhatari B; Clark GM; Paolini AG
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH; Berenstein CK
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Franck KH; Xu L; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Mar; 4(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 12118364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.
    Garadat SN; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):130-8. PubMed ID: 21168479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.