These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Utility of coronary artery calcium scoring in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. Tota-Maharaj R; McEvoy JW; Blaha MJ; Silverman MG; Nasir K; Blumenthal RS Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Sep; 11(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 22825529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of coronary calcium and myocardial perfusion in individuals with chest pain. Assessed by integrated rubidium-82 PET-CT. Brown TL; Merrill J; Hill P; Bengel FM Nuklearmedizin; 2008; 47(6):255-60. PubMed ID: 19057799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The feasibility of Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography stress testing in low-risk chest pain protocol patients. Osborne AD; Moore B; Ross MA; Pitts SR Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 10(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 21562374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain. Thomas DM; Larson CW; Cheezum MK; Villines TC; Branch KR; Blankstein R; Cury RC; Slim AM South Med J; 2015 Nov; 108(11):688-94. PubMed ID: 26539951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of computed tomographic angiography versus rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for the detection of patients with anatomical coronary artery disease. Chow BJ; Dennie C; Hoffmann U; So D; de Kemp RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS Can J Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 23(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 17703259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of myocardial perfusion 82Rb PET performed with CT- and transmission CT-based attenuation correction. Slomka PJ; Le Meunier L; Hayes SW; Acampa W; Oba M; Haemer GG; Berman DS; Germano G J Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1992-8. PubMed ID: 19038996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of low-dose rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease using 3D PET and normal database interpretation. Kaster T; Mylonas I; Renaud JM; Wells GA; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1135-45. PubMed ID: 22996831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of coronary calcium scanning for predicting inducible myocardial ischemia: Influence of patients' clinical presentation. Rozanski A; Gransar H; Wong ND; Shaw LJ; Miranda-Peats R; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Berman DS J Nucl Cardiol; 2007; 14(5):669-79. PubMed ID: 17826320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abnormal electron beam computed tomography results: the value of repeating myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the ongoing assessment of coronary artery disease. Askew JW; Miller TD; Araoz PA; Breen JF; Hodge DO; Gibbons RJ Mayo Clin Proc; 2008 Jan; 83(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18174005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]