These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18178913)

  • 1. Modified robotic lightweight endoscope (ViKY) validation in vivo in a porcine model.
    Gumbs AA; Crovari F; Vidal C; Henri P; Gayet B
    Surg Innov; 2007 Dec; 14(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 18178913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and testing of a compact endoscope manipulator for minimally invasive surgery.
    Berkelman P; Cinquin P; Boidard E; Troccaz J; Létoublon C; Long JA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16199377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and preliminary in vivo validation of a robotic laparoscope holder for minimally invasive surgery.
    Herman B; Dehez B; Duy KT; Raucent B; Dombre E; Krut S
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19455594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery.
    Phee SJ; Low SC; Sun ZL; Ho KY; Huang WM; Thant ZM
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Mar; 4(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18314917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical robotics. Evaluation of the Computer Motion AESOP 3000 robotic endoscope holder.
    Health Devices; 2002 Jul; 31(7):256-68. PubMed ID: 12187573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser-scan endoscope system for intraoperative geometry acquisition and surgical robot safety management.
    Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Nakamura Y
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 16624612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wireless virtual instrument measurement of surgeons' physical and mental workloads for robotic versus manual minimally invasive surgery.
    Smith WD; Berguer R; Rosser JC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():318-24. PubMed ID: 15455916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of monoscopic insertable, remotely controlled imaging device with a standard laparoscope in a porcine model.
    Hogle NJ; Hu T; Allen PK; Fowler DL
    Surg Innov; 2008 Dec; 15(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 18945706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tonatiuh II: assisting manipulator for laparoscopic surgery.
    Martínez AM; Flores RO; Vera MG; Salazar RC; Luis MJ; Daniel L
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2007; 16(5):310-3. PubMed ID: 17917995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex task performance in Cyberspace. Surgical procedures in a telepresence environment.
    Bowersox JC; LaPorta AJ; Cordts PR; Bhoyrul S; Shah A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():320-6. PubMed ID: 10163765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of a spherical mechanism for a minimally invasive surgical robot: theoretical and experimental approaches.
    Lum MJ; Rosen J; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1440-5. PubMed ID: 16830951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative 3D shape recovery of abdominal organs for laparoscopic data fusion.
    Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Nakamura Y; Hattori A; Suzuki S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():188-94. PubMed ID: 15458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PARASURG hybrid parallel robot for minimally invasive surgery.
    Pisla D; Gherman B; Plitea N; Gyurka B; Vaida C; Vlad L; Graur F; Radu C; Suciu M; Szilaghi A; Stoica A
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2011; 106(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 22165061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PARAMIS parallel robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Pisla D; Plitea N; Vaida C; Hesselbach J; Raatz A; Vlad L; Graur F; Gyurka B; Gherman B; Suciu M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2010; 105(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 21141094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and first in vivo trial of EvoLap, an active laparoscope positioner.
    Herman B; Duy KT; Dehez B; Polet R; Raucent B; Dombre E; Donnez J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 19423066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laser-pointing endoscope system for natural 3D interface between robotic equipments and surgeons.
    Nakamura Y; Hayashibe M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():348-54. PubMed ID: 11317767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.
    van Haasteren G; Levine S; Hayes W
    Pediatrics; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1642-9. PubMed ID: 19917586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joystick interfaces are not suitable for robotized endoscope applied to NOTES.
    Allemann P; Ott L; Asakuma M; Masson N; Perretta S; Dallemagne B; Coumaros D; De Mathelin M; Soler L; Marescaux J
    Surg Innov; 2009 Jun; 16(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19546121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.