These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray. Payne JA; Pereira BP Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials. Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives]. Morneburg T Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique. Abuasi HA; Wassell RW Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy and bond strength of addition silicones. Tjan AH; Heisler WH Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 1290614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in elastomeric impression materials. Craig RG; Sun Z Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):138-45. PubMed ID: 9028233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of viscosity to porosities in automixed elastomeric impressions. Soh G; Chong YH Clin Mater; 1991; 7(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10149132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I. Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression]. Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]