These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1817908)

  • 1. [Bond between wash elastomers and putty silicones].
    Pfeiffer P; Sommer MP; Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jul; 46(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 1817908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of contaminants on the adhesion of light-bodied silicones to putty silicones in putty-wash impression technique.
    Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 May; 59(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 3290451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials].
    Kikuchi M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1287-302. PubMed ID: 2135157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
    Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy and bond strength of addition silicones.
    Tjan AH; Heisler WH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 1290614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in elastomeric impression materials.
    Craig RG; Sun Z
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):138-45. PubMed ID: 9028233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship of viscosity to porosities in automixed elastomeric impressions.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Clin Mater; 1991; 7(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10149132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
    Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.