196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18179350)
1. The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.
Cole DA; Ciesla JA; Steiger JH
Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):381-398. PubMed ID: 18179350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multitrait-multimethod models in aging research.
Widaman KF
Exp Aging Res; 1992; 18(3-4):185-201. PubMed ID: 1459163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting measurement models in psychosomatic medicine research: a latent variable approach.
Llabre MM; Fitzpatrick SL
Psychosom Med; 2012; 74(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22286856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating measurement models in clinical research: covariance structure analysis of latent variable models of self-conception.
Hoyle RH
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1991 Feb; 59(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 2002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decomposing person and occasion-specific effects: an extension of latent state-trait (LSI) theory to hierarchical LST models.
Schermelleh-Engel K; Keith N; Moosbrugger H; Hodapp V
Psychol Methods; 2004 Jun; 9(2):198-219. PubMed ID: 15137889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The latent class multitrait-multimethod model.
Oberski DL; Hagenaars JA; Saris WE
Psychol Methods; 2015 Dec; 20(4):422-43. PubMed ID: 26651987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods.
Eid M; Nussbeck FW; Geiser C; Cole DA; Gollwitzer M; Lischetzke T
Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 18778153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state-trait analyses.
Geiser C; Lockhart G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):255-83. PubMed ID: 22309958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construct validity in health behavior research: interpreting latent variable models involving self-report and objective measures.
Palmer RF; Graham JW; Taylor B; Tatterson J
J Behav Med; 2002 Dec; 25(6):525-50. PubMed ID: 12462957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decomposing model fit: measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables.
O'Boyle EH; Williams LJ
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20718518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models.
Courvoisier DS; Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Geiser C; Cole DA
Psychol Assess; 2008 Sep; 20(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 18778163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling Common Traits and Method Effects in Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.
Pohl S; Steyer R
Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Jan; 45(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 26789084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P; Oertzen Tv
Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16953703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A semiparametric Bayesian approach for structural equation models.
Song XY; Pan JH; Kwok T; Vandenput L; Ohlsson C; Leung PC
Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):314-32. PubMed ID: 20533410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the multitrait multimethod (MTMM) to analyze family relational data.
Sidani S; Jones E
West J Nurs Res; 1995 Oct; 17(5):556-70. PubMed ID: 7571555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
Bagozzi RP
Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. PubMed ID: 17563175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Explaining general and specific factors in longitudinal, multimethod, and bifactor models: Some caveats and recommendations.
Koch T; Holtmann J; Bohn J; Eid M
Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):505-523. PubMed ID: 28737413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contextualized Personality Questionnaires: A Case for Copulas in Structural Equation Models for Categorical Data.
Braeken J; Kuppens P; De Boeck P; Tuerlinckx F
Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Nov; 48(6):845-70. PubMed ID: 26745596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using SAS PROC CALIS to fit Level-1 error covariance structures of latent growth models.
Ding CG; Jane TD
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):765-87. PubMed ID: 22351601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Thorny Relation Between Measurement Quality and Fit Index Cutoffs in Latent Variable Models.
McNeish D; An J; Hancock GR
J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 28631976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
