These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18179356)

  • 1. Rater biases in genetically informative research designs: comment on Bartels, Boomsma, Hudziak, van Beijsterveldt, and van den Oord (2007).
    Hoyt WT
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 18179356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
    Saito Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1547-60. PubMed ID: 16143966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: implications for estimating interrater reliability.
    Putka DJ; Le H; McCloy RA; Diaz T
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Sep; 93(5):959-81. PubMed ID: 18808219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twins and the study of rater (dis)agreement.
    Bartels M; Boomsma DI; Hudziak JJ; van Beijsterveldt TCEM; van den Oord EJCG
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):451-466. PubMed ID: 18179355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
    Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in psychotherapist ratings of client transference and insight.
    Markin RD; Kivlighan DM
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2007 Sep; 44(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 22122257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-rater reliability for noninvasive measurement of cardiac function in children.
    Stewart GM; Nguyen HB; Kim TY; Jauregui J; Hayes SR; Corbett S
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Jul; 24(7):433-7. PubMed ID: 18580818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement.
    Martell RF; Evans DP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):956-63. PubMed ID: 16162067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. P. E. van Kerrebroeck, A. C. van Voskuilen, J. P. Heesakkers, A. A. Lycklama a Nijholt, S. Siegel, U. Jonas, C. J. Fowler, M. Fall, J. B. Gajewski, M. M. Hassouna, F. Cappellano, M. M. Elhilali, D. F. Milam, A. K. Das, H. E. Dijkema and U. van den Hombergh. J Urol 2007; 178: 2029-2034.
    Reynolds WS; Bales GT
    J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2483-4; author reply 2484. PubMed ID: 18436258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological considerations in cohort study designs.
    Healy P; Devane D
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 21560924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Professionalism and communication in the intensive care unit: reliability and validity of a simulated family conference.
    Schmitz CC; Chipman JG; Luxenberg MG; Beilman GJ
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(4):224-38. PubMed ID: 19088667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
    Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it?
    Hoyt WT
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Mar; 5(1):64-86. PubMed ID: 10937323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surveying for "artifacts": the susceptibility of the OCB-performance evaluation relationship to common rater, item, and measurement context effects.
    Podsakoff NP; Whiting SW; Welsh DT; Mai KM
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):863-74. PubMed ID: 23565897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.