These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18180550)

  • 1. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between robust z and 0.3-Logit Difference procedures in assessing stability of linking items for the Rasch model.
    Huynh H; Rawls A
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22089507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
    Smith RM; Plackner C
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
    Chu KL; Kamata A
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M; Suanthong S
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.
    Paek I; Lee J; Stankov L; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 23816612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing one scale to describe two statewide exams.
    Paek I; Peres DG; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 19564697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the distribution of the unpaired t-statistic with paired data.
    Proschan MA
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1059-63. PubMed ID: 8783442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.