These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18180876)

  • 1. Permeate flux inflection due to concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration: A novel analytic approach.
    Kim AS
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2007 Dec; 24(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 18180876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrafiltration modeling of non-ionic microgels.
    Roa R; Zholkovskiy EK; Nägele G
    Soft Matter; 2015 May; 11(20):4106-22. PubMed ID: 25921331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions.
    Hong S; Faibish RS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1997 Dec; 196(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 9792752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part.
    Cojocaru C; Zakrzewska-Trznadel G; Miskiewicz A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 19414217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concentration Polarization of Interacting Solute Particles in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration.
    Bhattacharjee S; Kim AS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Apr; 212(1):81-99. PubMed ID: 10072278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrafiltration behavior of partially retained proteins and completely retained proteins using equally-staged single pass tangential flow filtration membranes.
    Arunkumar A; Zhang J; Singh N; Ghose S; Li ZJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Sep; 34(5):1137-1148. PubMed ID: 30019541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration.
    Broens F; Menne D; Pothof I; Blankert B; Roesink HD; Futselaar H; Lammertink RG; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1113-20. PubMed ID: 22227242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient.
    Dreszer C; Flemming HC; Zwijnenburg A; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():200-11. PubMed ID: 24374131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of protein adsorption effects on crossflow filtration using BSA and milk protein.
    Colton RH; Pahl I; Ottaviano LE; Bodeutsch T; Meyeroltmanns F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 11865780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for high-pressure ultrafiltration of blood.
    Moussy Y
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Jul; 69(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10820327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of polysaccharides produced by fermentation using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system.
    Brou A; Jaffrin MY; Ding LH; Courtois J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 May; 82(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 12632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-current crossflow microfiltration in a microchannel.
    Amar LI; Hill MI; Faria M; Guisado D; van Rijn CJM; Leonard EF
    Biomed Microdevices; 2019 Feb; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 30725201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of permeate flux during osmotic pressure-controlled electric field-enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration.
    Sarkar B; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Mar; 319(1):236-46. PubMed ID: 18068719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of produced water using turbulence promoter.
    Zhen XH; Yu SL; Wang BF; Zheng HF
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(6):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17294945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.