BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18181788)

  • 1. Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues.
    Goschke T; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jan; 19(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18181788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control.
    Schlaghecken F; Martini P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 21967273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.
    Sebanz N; Lackner U
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):859-76. PubMed ID: 17045811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intention formation induces episodic inhibition of distracting stimuli.
    Veling H; van Knippenberg A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 17991450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.
    Scherbaum S; Fischer R; Dshemuchadse M; Goschke T
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21044093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forgetting all else: on the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding.
    Shah JY; Friedman R; Kruglanski AW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 12500810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control.
    Hommel B; Fischer R; Colzato LS; van den Wildenberg WP; Cellini C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 22201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set.
    Houghton G; Pritchard R; Grange JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):466-76. PubMed ID: 19271859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential congruency effects in implicit sequence learning.
    Jiménez L; Lupiáñez J; Vaquero JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):690-700. PubMed ID: 19464194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple systems for cognitive control: evidence from a hybrid prime-Simon task.
    Schlaghecken F; Refaat M; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1542-53. PubMed ID: 21728456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alpha power and coherence primarily reflect neural activity related to stages of motor response during a continuous monitoring task.
    Moore RA; Gale A; Morris PH; Forrester D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18430481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.