470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18182182)
1. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of fabrication precision and mechanical reliability of 2 zirconia implant abutments.
Kerstein RB; Radke J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1029-36. PubMed ID: 19216271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
