These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18182608)

  • 1. Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):156. PubMed ID: 18182608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographers debate screening guidelines.
    Barnes DE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Jul; 14(7):59-73. PubMed ID: 10147530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [We should insist on mammographic mass screening. Its value for age groups 50-69 is indisputable].
    Larsson LG; Nyström L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1338-42. PubMed ID: 8656867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Progress in prevention: should we screen for risk factors or disease? A current debate in the prevention of cardiovascular events.
    Dennison CR; Hughes S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 19114796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods of assessing medical technology.
    Jonsson E
    World Hosp; 1987 Oct; 23(3-4):29-33. PubMed ID: 10302123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Some glipses from the history of mammography: from radiography of preparations to general screening].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8656864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Screening with mammography--a critical attitude is supported by new findings].
    Andersson I; Janzon L
    Lakartidningen; 1988 Nov; 85(44):3666-9. PubMed ID: 3059110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "I want to live": medicine betrayed by ideology in the political debate over Terri Schiavo.
    Annas GJ
    Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):49-80. PubMed ID: 17099993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task force 2: Investigator participation in clinical research.
    Califf RM; Nissen SE; DeMaria AN; Ohman EM; Pitt B; Willerson JT; Bilheimer DW; Cohn JN; Feigal DW; Hampson L; Lorell BH; Pepine CJ; Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(8):1729-36. PubMed ID: 15489116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammographic screening--a comment to the debate].
    Lindberg MJ
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1452. PubMed ID: 10765629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Helsinki Declaration revisions.
    Schuklenk U
    Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(1):29. PubMed ID: 16334459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
    Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Newspaper reporting of screening mammography.
    Ray JG
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):373-4. PubMed ID: 12204042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The results of mammography must be interpreted correctly even in a debate].
    Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(34):2980. PubMed ID: 7650980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arbitration of employment disputes.
    Weber RD
    Mich Med; 2001; 100(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15007963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rating game. Patients & insurers are rating the quality of your care. Do you know what they're saying?
    Glenn B
    Med Econ; 2008 Dec; 85(23):18-22. PubMed ID: 19209532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is high-low arbitration worth it?
    Shore EE
    Med Econ; 2007 Jun; 84(11):28. PubMed ID: 17621981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.