BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18182670)

  • 1. Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Termeer E; Severens JL; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 18182670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Bootsma GP; de Boo TM; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2991-7. PubMed ID: 16682725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by prophylactic antibiotics plus or minus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch Randomized Phase III Study.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; de Boo TM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Cheragwandi SA; Termeer A; Hensing CA; Akkermans J; Adang EM; Bootsma GP; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(31):7974-84. PubMed ID: 16258098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
    Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Febrile neutropenia: highlighting the role of prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during standard dose chemotherapy for solid tumors.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    Anticancer Drugs; 2006 Sep; 17(8):881-9. PubMed ID: 16940798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic implications of using pegfilgrastim rather than conventional G-CSF to prevent neutropenia during small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy.
    Tan Sean P; Chouaid C; Hettler D; Baud M; Hejblum G; Tilleul P
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1455-60. PubMed ID: 19419340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use and effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in primary prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in the outpatient setting.
    Tuffaha HW; Treish IM; Zaru L
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2008 Sep; 14(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 18524866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
    Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not cost-effective and does not increase patient comfort in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: an analysis using a Markov model.
    Chouaid C; Bassinet L; Fuhrman C; Monnet I; Housset B
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):2700-7. PubMed ID: 9704720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective cost analysis of management of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients in Spain.
    Mayordomo JI; López A; Viñolas N; Castellanos J; Pernas S; Domingo Alonso J; Frau A; Layola M; Antonio Gasquet J; Sánchez J;
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Oct; 25(10):2533-42. PubMed ID: 19722781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the treatment of established febrile neutropenia.
    Pérez Velasco R
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2011 Sep; 17(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 20562168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor decrease febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy in children with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sung L; Nathan PC; Lange B; Beyene J; Buchanan GR
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Aug; 22(16):3350-6. PubMed ID: 15310780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
    Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a formulary change from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on outcomes in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Wong SF; Chan HO
    Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Mar; 25(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 15843284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prevention of febrile neutropenia.
    Pascoe J; Cullen M
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 18(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 16721125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.
    Dale DC
    Drugs; 2002; 62 Suppl 1():1-15. PubMed ID: 12479591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bone marrow suppression--including guidelines for the appropriate use of G-CSF].
    Watanabe T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2003 Jun; 30(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 12852340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When the risk of febrile neutropenia is 20%, prophylactic colony-stimulating factor use is clinically effective, but is it cost-effective?
    Adams JR; Angelotta C; Bennett CL
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2975-7. PubMed ID: 16682722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.