202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18182688)
1. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18182688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the linac design on intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck plans.
Topolnjak R; van der Heide UA; Meijer GJ; van Asselen B; Raaijmakers CP; Lagendijk JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):169-82. PubMed ID: 17183134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical significance of multi-leaf collimator positional errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Oliver M; Gagne I; Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 20817291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison between 3DCRT and IMRT using different multileaf collimators in the treatment of brain tumors.
Ding M; Newman F; Chen C; Stuhr K; Gaspar LE
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19181248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC.
Rangel A; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3304-9. PubMed ID: 19673226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of MLC leaf position, collimator rotation angle, and gantry rotation angle errors on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Bai S; Li G; Wang M; Jiang Q; Zhang Y; Wei Y
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 23402928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consequences of leaf calibration errors on IMRT delivery.
Sastre-Padro M; Welleweerd J; Malinen E; Eilertsen K; Olsen DR; van der Heide UA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1147-56. PubMed ID: 17264376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interfractional set-up errors evaluation by daily electronic portal imaging of IMRT in head and neck cancer patients.
Pehlivan B; Pichenot C; Castaing M; Auperin A; Lefkopoulos D; Arriagada R; Bourhis J
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19031160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity modulated radiotherapy improves target coverage and parotid gland sparing when delivering total mucosal irradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck of unknown primary site.
Bhide S; Clark C; Harrington K; Nutting CM
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 17707198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct impact analysis of multi-leaf collimator leaf position errors on dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a pass rate calculation between measured planar doses with and without the position errors.
Tatsumi D; Hosono MN; Nakada R; Ishii K; Tsutsumi S; Inoue M; Ichida T; Miki Y
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(20):N237-46. PubMed ID: 21965281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
