769 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18182699)
21. Monte Carlo simulation of strand-break induction on plasmid DNA in aqueous solution by monoenergetic electrons.
Watanabe R; Saito K
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2002 Sep; 41(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 12373330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Role of DNA/chromatin organisation and scavenging capacity in USX- and proton- induced DNA damage.
Alloni D; Ballarini F; Friedland W; Liotta M; Molinelli S; Ottolenghi A; Paretzke HG; Rossetti M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):141-6. PubMed ID: 17284477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tests of the double-strand break, lethal-potentially lethal and repair-misrepair models for mammalian cell survival using data for survival as a function of delayed-plating interval for log-phase Chinese hamster V79 cells.
Lange CS; Mayer PJ; Reddy NM
Radiat Res; 1997 Sep; 148(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 9291360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An investigation on the capabilities of the PENELOPE MC code in nanodosimetry.
Bernal MA; Liendo JA
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):620-5. PubMed ID: 19292002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relative biological effectiveness of the alpha-particle emitter (211)At for double-strand break induction in human fibroblasts.
Claesson AK; Stenerlöw B; Jacobsson L; Elmroth K
Radiat Res; 2007 Mar; 167(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 17316073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA strand breaks by direct energy deposition by Auger and photo-electrons ejected from DNA constituent atoms following K-shell photoabsorption.
Watanabe R; Yokoya A; Fujii K; Saito K
Int J Radiat Biol; 2004; 80(11-12):823-32. PubMed ID: 15764389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cluster effects within the local effect model.
Elsässer T; Scholz M
Radiat Res; 2007 Mar; 167(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 17316069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. DNA double strand break (DSB) induction and cell survival in iodine-enhanced computed tomography (CT).
Streitmatter SW; Stewart RD; Jenkins PA; Jevremovic T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6164-6184. PubMed ID: 28703119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of track structure on the understanding of relative biological effectiveness for induction of chromosomal exchanges in human lymphocytes.
Moiseenko VV; Edwards AA; Nikjoo H; Prestwich WV
Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 9008213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Monte Carlo Simulation of Double-Strand Break Induction and Conversion after Ultrasoft X-rays Irradiation.
Hsiao YY; Chen FH; Chan CC; Tsai CC
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Simulation of DSB yield for high LET radiation.
Friedrich T; Durante M; Scholz M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Sep; 166(1-4):61-5. PubMed ID: 25883306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of indirect actions and oxygen on relative biological effectiveness: estimate of DSB inductions and conversions induced by therapeutic proton beams.
Luo WR; Chen FH; Huang RJ; Chen YP; Hsiao YY
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Feb; 96(2):187-196. PubMed ID: 31682784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations.
Pater P; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I; Bernal MA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121708. PubMed ID: 25471955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by Auger-electron emission.
Hsiao YY; Hung TH; Tu SJ; Tung CJ
Int J Radiat Biol; 2014 May; 90(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 24517473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of Radio-Induced Damage in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with 40 kVp, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays by Means of Micro and Nanodosimetric Calculations.
Tang N; Bueno M; Meylan S; Perrot Y; Tran HN; Freneau A; Dos Santos M; Vaurijoux A; Gruel G; Bernal MA; Bordage MC; Emfietzoglou D; Francis Z; Guatelli S; Ivanchenko V; Karamitros M; Kyriakou I; Shin WG; Incerti S; Villagrasa C
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 31835321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of X-ray and proton beam low energy secondary electron track structures using the low energy models of Geant4.
McNamara AL; Guatelli S; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Rosenfeld AB
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22040102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monte Carlo simulation of the RBE of I-131 radiation using DNA damage as biomarker.
Ezzati AO; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Studenski MT
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Jun; 40(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 28397060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Track structure, radiation quality and initial radiobiological events: considerations based on the PARTRAC code experience.
Alloni D; Campa A; Friedland W; Mariotti L; Ottolenghi A
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):77-86. PubMed ID: 21957961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Induction and disappearance of G2 chromatid breaks in lymphocytes after low doses of low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET fast neutrons.
Vral A; Thierens H; Baeyens A; De Ridder L
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Apr; 78(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 12020436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
