BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18183670)

  • 1. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure!
    Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic discrepancy: searching for quality assurance methods that work.
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 17074691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The current and ideal state of anatomic pathology patient safety.
    Raab SS
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2014 Jun; 46(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 25016679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Secondary case review methods and anatomic pathology culture.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):829-31. PubMed ID: 20472838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathology and patient safety: the critical role of pathology informatics in error reduction and quality initiatives.
    Becich MJ; Gilbertson JR; Gupta D; Patel A; Grzybicki DM; Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):913-43, vi. PubMed ID: 15555749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Nov; 30(11):1469-71. PubMed ID: 17063090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
    Roy JE; Hunt JL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prelude to error reduction in anatomic pathology.
    Nakhleh RE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):489-90. PubMed ID: 16146812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
    ; Nakhleh R; Coffin C; Cooper K
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 126(3):337-340. PubMed ID: 16880147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
    Silverman JF
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):897-9. PubMed ID: 16819334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
    Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    ; Silverman JF; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Pereira TC; Swanson PE
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Aug; 37(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 16867859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.