These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1818506)

  • 1. Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs.
    Bager F; Petersen J
    Acta Vet Scand; 1991; 32(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 1818506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enrichment for isolating Salmonella Choleraesuis and other Salmonella spp. from pigs.
    Osumi T; Asai T; Namimatsu T; Sato S; Yamamoto K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2003 Aug; 65(8):949-51. PubMed ID: 12951433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces.
    Hoorfar J; Mortensen AV
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Nov; 61(11):1426-9. PubMed ID: 11108192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs.
    Davies PR; Turkson PK; Funk JA; Nichols MA; Ladely SR; Fedorka-Cray PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 89(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 10945794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.
    Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salmonellas in Danish pigs: a comparison of three isolation methods.
    Skovgaard N; Christensen SG; Gulistani AW
    J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Aug; 95(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 3894510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between semisolid Rappaport and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis media for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from foods and feeds.
    Perales I; Erkiaga E
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 14(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1742172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate broth with Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage sludge.
    Rhodes P; Quesnel LB
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1986 Feb; 60(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 3700279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine.
    Sibley J; Yue B; Huang F; Harding J; Kingdon J; Chirino-Trejo M; Appleyard GD
    Can J Vet Res; 2003 Jul; 67(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 12889729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparison of methods for the enrichment of Salmonellae from human feces].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Nov; 253(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 6762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observations on the occurrence of Salmonella cholerae-suis and other salmonellas in two herds of feeder pigs.
    Williams DR; Hunter D; Binder J; Hough E
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Jun; 86(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 7240737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new enrichment broth for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from poultry products.
    Blivet D; Salvat G; Humbert F; Colin P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Sep; 38(2-3):211-6. PubMed ID: 9506286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of culture media for selective enrichment and isolation of Salmonella in seafood.
    Kumar R; Surendran PK; Thampuran N
    J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(5):1468-71. PubMed ID: 21140659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach.
    Wilkins W; Waldner C; Rajić A; McFall M; Muckle A; Mainar-Jaime RC
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():115-20. PubMed ID: 21083825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salmonella surveillance with reference to pigs--Cardiff abattoir, 1968-1975.
    Harvey RW; Price TH; Morgan J
    J Hyg (Lond); 1977 Jun; 78(3):439-48. PubMed ID: 325128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of classical isolation protocols with a 24 h screen to detect viable salmonellas in faeces.
    Cherrington CA; Huis in't Veld JH
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1993 Jul; 75(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8365957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the efficiency of Rappaport-Vassiliadis, tetrathionate and selenite broths with and without pre-enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in animal waste biogas plants.
    Schlundt J; Munch B
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1993 Aug; 279(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 8219504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the enrichment medium on the detection and diversity of Salmonella from porcine duodenal content.
    De Busser EV; Maes D; Houf K; Dewulf J; De Zutter L
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2013 Feb; 10(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 23336270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in finishing swine at Canadian abattoirs.
    Letellier A; Messier S; Quessy S
    J Food Prot; 1999 Jan; 62(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9921823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.
    Feder I; Nietfeld JC; Galland J; Yeary T; Sargeant JM; Oberst R; Tamplin ML; Luchansky JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2477-84. PubMed ID: 11427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.