These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18186680)
1. Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. Wendt-Nordahl G; Trojan L; Alken P; Michel MS; Knoll T J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1439-44. PubMed ID: 18186680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved functional deflection with a dual-deflection flexible ureteroscope. Shvarts O; Perry KT; Goff B; Schulam PG J Endourol; 2004 Mar; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 15072620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets. Landman J; Monga M; El-Gabry EA; Rehman J; Lee DI; Bhayani S; Sundaram CP; Clayman RV J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2377-9. PubMed ID: 11992041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible ureteroscopes. Auge BK; Sekula JJ; Springhart WP; Zhu S; Zhong P; Preminger GM J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):967-70. PubMed ID: 15311011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. Michel MS; Knoll T; Ptaschnyk T; Köhrmann KU; Alken P Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):312-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 12180234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Durability of working channel in flexible ureteroscopes when inserting ureteroscopic devices. Seto C; Ishiura Y; Egawa M; Komatsu K; Namiki M J Endourol; 2006 Mar; 20(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 16548735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics. Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope. Lusch A; Abdelshehid C; Hidas G; Osann KE; Okhunov Z; McDougall E; Landman J J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 23402369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach. Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis. Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter? Bach T; Geavlete B; Herrmann TR; Gross AJ J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1639-43. PubMed ID: 18620506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. Pasqui F; Dubosq F; Tchala K; Tligui M; Gattegno B; Thibault P; Traxer O Eur Urol; 2004 Jan; 45(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 14667517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis. Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes. Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Novel Female Gender Flexible Ureteroscope: Comparison of Flow and Deflection to a Standard Flexible Ureteroscope. Karani R; Arada RB; Ayad M; Xie L; Brevik A; Peta A; Jiang P; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):840-846. PubMed ID: 33439772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of nitinol stone retrieval baskets for flexible ureteroscopy. Netsch C; Herrera G; Gross AJ; Bach T J Endourol; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1217-20. PubMed ID: 21682599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dual-channel flexible ureteroscope: evaluation of deflection, flow, illumination, and optics. Haberman K; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Chotikawanich E; Monga M J Endourol; 2011 Sep; 25(9):1411-4. PubMed ID: 21797758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Preminger GM Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]