These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18186935)

  • 1. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12925550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals.
    Lium JT; Laerum H; Schulz T; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 16929040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow.
    Lium JT; Faxvaag A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():1031-6. PubMed ID: 17108645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types.
    Miller RH; Sim I; Newman J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. PubMed ID: 15360895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electronic medical records in somatic hospitals--availability and clinical use].
    Laerum H; Ellingsen G; Faxvaag A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2540-3. PubMed ID: 12522880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic medical record systems in Israel's public hospitals.
    Lejbkowicz I; Denekamp Y; Reis S; Goldenberg D
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 15473582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR.
    Rose AF; Schnipper JL; Park ER; Poon EG; Li Q; Middleton B
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15694885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals.
    Aarts J; Berg M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):999-1002. PubMed ID: 15360962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?
    Loomis GA; Ries JS; Saywell RM; Thakker NR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 12160503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The user in the design process of an EPR.
    van der Meijden MJ; Tange HJ; Boiten J; Troost J; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():224-8. PubMed ID: 11187546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective.
    Aaronson JW; Murphy-Cullen CL; Chop WM; Frey RD
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 11271741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case study of an EMR system at a large hospital in India: challenges and strategies for successful adoption.
    Scholl J; Syed-Abdul S; Ahmed LA
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):958-67. PubMed ID: 21846508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
    Tjora AH; Scambler G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Establishment of an electronic medical record in a psychiatric hospital: evolution of professionals' perceptions].
    Boyer L; Renaud MH; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Fieschi M; Samuelian JC
    Encephale; 2010 Jun; 36(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20620266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study.
    Scott JT; Rundall TG; Vogt TM; Hsu J
    BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7528):1313-6. PubMed ID: 16269467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.