These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18188539)

  • 1. Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution.
    de Waal EE; Konings MK; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Intensive Care Med; 2008 Apr; 34(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 18188539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
    Fellahi JL; Fischer MO; Rebet O; Massetti M; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21880510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.
    van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    de Waal EE; Kalkman CJ; Rex S; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1904-9. PubMed ID: 17581493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
    Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients.
    Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; van der Spoel HI; de Vries PM
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Aug; 22(8):766-71. PubMed ID: 8880245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
    Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology?
    Van De Water JM; Miller TW; Vogel RL; Mount BE; Dalton ML
    Chest; 2003 Jun; 123(6):2028-33. PubMed ID: 12796185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution.
    Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; Scheffer GJ; van der Spoel HI; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Dec; 77(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 9014628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution.
    Faini A; Omboni S; Tifrea M; Bubenek S; Lazar O; Parati G
    Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
    Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.
    Spiess BD; Patel MA; Soltow LO; Wright IH
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 11687996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
    Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Cohen AJ; Arnaudov D; Zabeeda D; Schultheis L; Lashinger J; Schachner A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Jul; 14(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 9726617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three haemodynamic monitoring methods in comatose post cardiac arrest patients.
    Staer-Jensen H; Sunde K; Nakstad ER; Eritsland J; Andersen GØ
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Jun; 52(3):141-148. PubMed ID: 29544369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
    Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method.
    van der Kleij SC; Koolen BB; Newhall DA; Gerritse BM; Rosseel PM; Rijpstra TA; Geisler FE; van der Meer NJ
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jul; 67(7):729-33. PubMed ID: 22420758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
    Sageman WS; Amundson DE
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroke volume equation for impedance cardiography.
    Bernstein DP; Lemmens HJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jul; 43(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16255425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.