These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18188627)

  • 21. The location marker effect. Saccadic latency increases with target eccentricity.
    Hodgson TL
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Aug; 145(4):539-42. PubMed ID: 12172666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural basis of the set-size effect in frontal eye field: timing of attention during visual search.
    Cohen JY; Heitz RP; Woodman GF; Schall JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 101(4):1699-704. PubMed ID: 19176607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.
    Roggeveen AB; Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Where action impairs visual encoding: an event-related fMRI study.
    Danielmeier C; Zysset S; Müsseler J; von Cramon DY
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15325411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual search.
    Poynter W; Roberts C
    Laterality; 2012; 17(6):711-26. PubMed ID: 23098199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Overt and covert visual search in primates: reaction times and gaze shift strategies.
    Nothdurft HC; Pigarev IN; Kastner S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 8(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 19618485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Difficulty of visual search modulates neuronal interactions and response variability in the frontal eye field.
    Cohen JY; Pouget P; Woodman GF; Subraveti CR; Schall JD; Rossi AF
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2580-7. PubMed ID: 17855586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Context-dependent effects of substantia nigra stimulation on eye movements.
    Basso MA; Liu P
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 97(6):4129-42. PubMed ID: 17392414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. fMRI-guided TMS on cortical eye fields: the frontal but not intraparietal eye fields regulate the coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements.
    Van Ettinger-Veenstra HM; Huijbers W; Gutteling TP; Vink M; Kenemans JL; Neggers SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3469-80. PubMed ID: 19812293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual feature selectivity in frontal eye fields induced by experience in mature macaques.
    Bichot NP; Schall JD; Thompson KG
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):697-9. PubMed ID: 8649514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.
    Yamashita J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30141124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.