253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18188809)
21. The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter.
Vach W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):655-61. PubMed ID: 15939215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The brief fatigue inventory: comparison of data collection using a novel audio device with conventional paper questionnaire.
Pallett E; Rentowl P; Hanning C
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2009 Sep; 38(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 19577421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [VII: Diagnostic trials: Simple measures of validity and reliability].
Krummenauer F
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Apr; 220(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 12695973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage.
Bochmann F; Howell JP; Meier C; Becht C; Thiel MA
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 19384783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies.
O'Leary S; Lund M; Ytre-Hauge TJ; Holm SR; Naess K; Dalland LN; McPhail SM
Physiotherapy; 2014 Mar; 100(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24262334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can the modified functional independence measure be reliably obtained from the patient medical record by different raters?
Gabbe BJ; Sutherland AM; Wolfe R; Williamson OD; Cameron PA
J Trauma; 2007 Dec; 63(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 18212664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Repeatability and reproducibility of numerical rating scales and visual analogue scales for canine pruritus severity scoring.
Plant JD
Vet Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 18(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 17845616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spartanburg Fall Risk Assessment Tool: a simple three-step process.
Robey-Williams C; Rush KL; Bendyk H; Patton LM; Chamberlain D; Sparks T
Appl Nurs Res; 2007 May; 20(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 17481472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationships between statistical measures of agreement: sensitivity, specificity and kappa.
Feuerman M; Miller AR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):930-3. PubMed ID: 19018927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard.
Danker-Hopfe H; Anderer P; Zeitlhofer J; Boeck M; Dorn H; Gruber G; Heller E; Loretz E; Moser D; Parapatics S; Saletu B; Schmidt A; Dorffner G
J Sleep Res; 2009 Mar; 18(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 19250176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [On the reliability of the description of morphological characteristics in traditional Chinese tongue diagnostics].
Li Y; Linde K; Dai J; Zhang J; Hager S; Saller R; Melchart D
Forsch Komplementmed; 2009 Apr; 16(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 19420955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantifying Interrater Agreement and Reliability Between Thoracic Pathologists: Paradoxical Behavior of Cohen's Kappa in the Presence of a High Prevalence of the Histopathologic Feature in Lung Cancer.
Tan KS; Yeh YC; Adusumilli PS; Travis WD
JTO Clin Res Rep; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100618. PubMed ID: 38283651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale.
da Costa SP; van der Schans CP
Acta Paediatr; 2008 Jan; 97(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18201309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Determining the quality of rater judgements using intraclass correlation, and enhancing rater judgements].
Wirtz M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Dec; 43(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 15565540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interrater reliability and accuracy of clinicians and trained research assistants performing prospective data collection in emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.
Cruz CO; Meshberg EB; Shofer FS; McCusker CM; Chang AM; Hollander JE
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 54(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19185392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interrater reliability of the Antipsychotic Non-Neurological Side-Effects Rating Scale measured in patients treated with clozapine.
Ohlsen RI; Williamson R; Yusufi B; Mullan J; Irving D; Mukherjee S; Page E; Aitchison KJ; Barnes TR
J Psychopharmacol; 2008 May; 22(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 18541627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interrater reliability estimators tested against true interrater reliabilities.
Zhao X; Feng GC; Ao SH; Liu PL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):232. PubMed ID: 36038846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of interrater reliability assessing oral health in acute care settings.
Konradsen H; Trosborg I; Christensen L; Pedersen PU
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Jun; 20(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 24888998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
