These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18190342)

  • 61. Selection and genetic (co)variance in bighorn sheep.
    Coltman DW; O'Donoghue P; Hogg JT; Festa-Bianchet M
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1372-82. PubMed ID: 16050112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.
    Avila V; Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; Hill WG; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):1974-87. PubMed ID: 24689841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. What affects the predictability of evolutionary constraints using a G-matrix? The relative effects of modular pleiotropy and mutational correlation.
    Chebib J; Guillaume F
    Evolution; 2017 Oct; 71(10):2298-2312. PubMed ID: 28755417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution.
    Wilson AJ; Pemberton JM; Pilkington JG; Coltman DW; Mifsud DV; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Jul; 4(7):e216. PubMed ID: 16756391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Genotype x environment interactions and genetic parameters for fecal egg count and production traits of Merino sheep.
    Pollott GE; Greeff JC
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Oct; 82(10):2840-51. PubMed ID: 15484934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Mutational Pleiotropy and the Strength of Stabilizing Selection Within and Between Functional Modules of Gene Expression.
    Collet JM; McGuigan K; Allen SL; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Genetics; 2018 Apr; 208(4):1601-1616. PubMed ID: 29437825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Phenotypic lag and population extinction in the moving-optimum model: insights from a small-jumps limit.
    Kopp M; Nassar E; Pardoux E
    J Math Biol; 2018 Nov; 77(5):1431-1458. PubMed ID: 29980824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability.
    Pavlicev M; Cheverud JM; Wagner GP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jun; 278(1713):1903-12. PubMed ID: 21106581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits?
    Houle D
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):241-53. PubMed ID: 9720283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of
    Sztepanacz JL; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Genetics; 2017 Aug; 206(4):2185-2198. PubMed ID: 28642270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Change and maintenance of variation in quantitative traits in the context of the Price equation.
    Zhang XS; Hill WG
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Feb; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 19836408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.
    Geiler-Samerotte K; Sartori FMO; Siegal ML
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2019 Apr; 88():54-66. PubMed ID: 29751086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Directional selection and variation in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Hill WG
    Genetics; 1987 Nov; 117(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 3692142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation-selection balance for polygenic traits.
    Turelli M
    Genetics; 1985 Sep; 111(1):165-95. PubMed ID: 4029610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Genetic variability and selection criteria in rice mutant lines as revealed by quantitative traits.
    Oladosu Y; Rafii MY; Abdullah N; Abdul Malek M; Rahim HA; Hussin G; Abdul Latif M; Kareem I
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():190531. PubMed ID: 25431777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
    Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.
    Lande R
    Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1835-46. PubMed ID: 17683427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Why are phenotypic mutation rates much higher than genotypic mutation rates?
    Bürger R; Willensdorfer M; Nowak MA
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 16143614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Mutation and conflicts between artificial and natural selection for quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mbaga SH
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):171-81. PubMed ID: 9720278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Phenotypic variation and natural selection at catsup, a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene in Drosophila.
    Carbone MA; Jordan KW; Lyman RF; Harbison ST; Leips J; Morgan TJ; DeLuca M; Awadalla P; Mackay TF
    Curr Biol; 2006 May; 16(9):912-9. PubMed ID: 16682353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.