BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18190432)

  • 21. Validity of reaction index and positivity ratio?
    Andersen KE; Andersen F
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 May; 58(5):320. PubMed ID: 18416773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents.
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Mar; 20(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 2721192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
    Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patch test technique.
    Wilkinson M
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 164(1):4. PubMed ID: 21175560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The prevention and management of the angry back (excited skin syndrome [ESS]) in patch testing: Part II.
    Fisher AA
    Cutis; 1997 Jan; 59(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 9013064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The problem of the "epicutaneous standard test"].
    Frosch PJ
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1989; 37(4):152. PubMed ID: 2791893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Allergy test batteries for leg ulcers].
    Truchetet F
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1999 Apr; 126(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 10421943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity].
    Le Coz CJ; Sasseville D
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):610-6. PubMed ID: 19686897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Positive photopatch tests in polymorphous light eruption.
    Horio T
    Photodermatol; 1989 Aug; 6(4):194-5. PubMed ID: 2587433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
    Mitchell JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Prick test and patch test].
    Shono M
    Arerugi; 2008 Feb; 57(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18349584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of meteorological conditions on patch test results with 12 standard series allergens (fragrances, biocides, topical ingredients).
    Uter W; Hegewald J; Kränke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 158(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 18284398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sanitary napkin contact dermatitis of the vulva: location-dependent differences in skin surface conditions may play a role in negative patch test results.
    Wakashin K
    J Dermatol; 2007 Dec; 34(12):834-7. PubMed ID: 18078410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is allergic contact dermatitis being overlooked?
    del Savio B; Sherertz EF
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Jun; 3(6):537-43. PubMed ID: 8081533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in North India.
    Handa S; Jindal R
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):194-6. PubMed ID: 21393954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contact dermatitis and diagnostic techniques.
    Rietschel RL
    Allergy Proc; 1989; 10(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2534095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contact dermatitis to parthenium simulating lichen nitidus.
    De D; Jindal R; Kanwar AJ
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(3):286-7. PubMed ID: 20445305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revised minimal baseline series of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group: evidence-based approach.
    Alikhan A; Cheng LS; Ale I; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Eun HC; Goh CL; Goossens A; Lachapelle JM; McFadden J; Nixon R; Sasseville D; Maibach HI
    Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 21504701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Characteristics of patients with hand dermatitis referred to the contact dermatitis unit of a tertiary hospital and impact of patch testing on diagnosis].
    Carrascosa JM; Benvenuti F; Rodríguez C; Ferrándiz C
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2009; 100(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 19709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.