These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation. de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique. Schwartz JL; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 2098728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case report: utilizing a posterior composite resin with a microfill resin veneer in Class IV restorations. Herrin HK; Luddington JA; Berry EA; Von der Lehr WN Fla Dent J; 1986; 57(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 3467988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds? Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treating patients with CARE (comfortable aesthetic restorations): reducing postoperative sensitivity in direct posterior composite restorations. Ward DH Dent Today; 2004 Aug; 23(8):60, 62, 64-5. PubMed ID: 15354708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The color differences between different thicknesses of resin veneered over amalgam. Al-Jazairy YH; El-Hejazi AA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):38-45. PubMed ID: 16299605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy). Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials. Croll TP Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations. Brackett WW; Robinson PB Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]