BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18190724)

  • 1. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.
    Vachon CM; van Gils CH; Sellers TA; Ghosh K; Pruthi S; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS
    Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(6):217. PubMed ID: 18190724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density correlation with Gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
    Palomares MR; Machia JR; Lehman CD; Daling JR; McTiernan A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jul; 15(7):1324-30. PubMed ID: 16835331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.
    Tice JA; Cummings SR; Ziv E; Kerlikowske K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Nov; 94(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16261410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.
    Chen J; Pee D; Ayyagari R; Graubard B; Schairer C; Byrne C; Benichou J; Gail MH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(17):1215-26. PubMed ID: 16954474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
    Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
    Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.
    Tice JA; Cummings SR; Smith-Bindman R; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Kerlikowske K
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Mar; 148(5):337-47. PubMed ID: 18316752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.
    Boyd NF; Rommens JM; Vogt K; Lee V; Hopper JL; Yaffe MJ; Paterson AD
    Lancet Oncol; 2005 Oct; 6(10):798-808. PubMed ID: 16198986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the prediction performance for breast cancer risk based on volumetric mammographic density at different thresholds.
    Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 29884207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer.
    Boyd NF; Martin LJ; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
    J Br Menopause Soc; 2006 Dec; 12(4):186-93. PubMed ID: 17178021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrated breast cancer risk assessment and management model based on fuzzy cognitive maps.
    Subramanian J; Karmegam A; Papageorgiou E; Papandrianos N; Vasukie A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Mar; 118(3):280-97. PubMed ID: 25697987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement challenge: protocol for international case-control comparison of mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk.
    Dench E; Bond-Smith D; Darcey E; Lee G; Aung YK; Chan A; Cuzick J; Ding ZY; Evans CF; Harvey J; Highnam R; Hsieh MK; Kontos D; Li S; Mariapun S; Nickson C; Nguyen TL; Pertuz S; Procopio P; Rajaram N; Repich K; Tan M; Teo SH; Trinh NH; Ursin G; Wang C; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack V; Nielsen M; Shepherd J; Hopper JL; Stone J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031041. PubMed ID: 31892647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of adding breast density to breast cancer risk models: A systematic review.
    Vilmun BM; Vejborg I; Lynge E; Lillholm M; Nielsen M; Nielsen MB; Carlsen JF
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():109019. PubMed ID: 32361308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?
    Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J; Creasman J; Tice JA; Ziv E; Cummings SR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 15741573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.
    Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; McLelland R; Lee Y; Cole EB; Mattingly D; Lee J
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 16979072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.
    Torres-Mejía G; De Stavola B; Allen DS; Pérez-Gavilán JJ; Ferreira JM; Fentiman IS; Dos Santos Silva I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1052-9. PubMed ID: 15894652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.