114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18190826)
1. Can digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography biopsy findings predict the side of nodal metastasis in prostate cancer?
Spiess PE; Busby JE; Jordan JJ; Steinberg JR; Bassett RL; Davuluri R; Burt K; Troncoso P; Lee AK; Taylor SH; Pisters LL
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18190826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical utility of transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Shapiro A; Lebensart PD; Pode D; Bloom RA
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):668-71. PubMed ID: 8062008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship of ultrasound staging and bilateral biopsy positivity to outcome in stage T1c prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.
Liebross RH; Pollack A; Lankford SP; von Eschenbach AC; Zagars GK
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 9763087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative assessment of tumor aggressiveness in localized prostatic carcinoma].
Hammerer P; Henke RP; Hübner D; Huland H
Urologe A; 1995 Sep; 34(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 7483160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of the anatomical location of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant prostate biopsies for the nodal status of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Dunzinger M; Sega W; Madersbacher S; Schorn A
Eur Urol; 1997; 31(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 9129923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.
Rahman S; Cosmatos H; Dave G; Williams S; Tome M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):906-10. PubMed ID: 21300478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.
Tsui KH; Chang PL; Wang TM; Hsieh ML
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 20(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9178589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Yield of ultrasonography-guided transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate].
Fernández González I; Ruiz Rubio JL; Llorente Abarca C; Aramburu González JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Herrero Payo A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1995; 48(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 7544968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perineural invasion and seminal vesicle involvement predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in men with localized carcinoma of the prostate.
Stone NN; Stock RG; Parikh D; Yeghiayan P; Unger P
J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1722-6. PubMed ID: 9783940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: screening and preoperative staging].
Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1991 Nov; 30(6):378-86. PubMed ID: 1722921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer].
Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H
Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A more advanced clinical stage is positively correlated with an increased prostate cancer detection rate.
Roobol MJ; Kranse R; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2002 Jan; 59(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 11796288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer - by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography?
Hsu CY; Joniau S; Oyen R; Roskams T; Van Poppel H
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):982-5. PubMed ID: 16945120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transrectal ultrasound and core biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. A study of pretreatment investigation strategy for patients with suspected prostate cancer.
Norberg M
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1994; 393():1-21. PubMed ID: 8184698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density.
Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
