These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18190996)
1. Bayesian classification for the selection of in vitro human embryos using morphological and clinical data. Morales DA; Bengoetxea E; Larrañaga P; García M; Franco Y; Fresnada M; Merino M Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):104-16. PubMed ID: 18190996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection of human embryos for transfer by Bayesian classifiers. Morales DA; Bengoetxea E; Larrañaga P Comput Biol Med; 2008; 38(11-12):1177-86. PubMed ID: 18951123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification. Manna C; Nanni L; Lumini A; Pappalardo S Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 23177416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian network model for predicting pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. Corani G; Magli C; Giusti A; Gianaroli L; Gambardella LM Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1783-92. PubMed ID: 24209924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]. Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals. van Peperstraten AM; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Jansen L; Scheenjes E; Braat DD; Grol RP; Kremer JA Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):2036-42. PubMed ID: 18565969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical obligation for restricting the number of embryos transferred to women: combating the multiple-birth epidemic from in vitro fertilization. Van Voorhis BJ; Ryan GL Semin Reprod Med; 2010 Jul; 28(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 20683792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feature selection in Bayesian classifiers for the prognosis of survival of cirrhotic patients treated with TIPS. Blanco R; Inza I; Merino M; Quiroga J; Larrañaga P J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):376-88. PubMed ID: 15967731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Techniques, interrogations and results of medically assisted procreation]. Letur-Könirsch H; Olivennes F; Raoul-Duval A; Frydman R Pediatrie; 1993; 48(12):872-82. PubMed ID: 8047398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Borini A; Cattoli M; Bulletti C; Coticchio G Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():49-58. PubMed ID: 18443329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simplified technique for fertilization and culture of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Feichtinger W; Kemeter P Acta Eur Fertil; 1983; 14(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 6670438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study. Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES; Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Nuclear status of day 2 preembryos affects embryo quality and implantation potential]. Liu Q; Zhu GJ; Hu J; Wei YL; Ren XL; Zhang HW; Li YF; Jin L; Yue J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Jan; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 18297807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a woman's smoking status on oocyte, zygote, and day 3 pre-embryo quality in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Gruber I; Just A; Birner M; Lösch A Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17905237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Single embryo transfer: is Scandinavian model valuable in France?]. Belaisch-Allart J; Mayenga JM; Grefenstette I; Chouraqui A; Serkine AM; Abirached F; Kulski O Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 18922732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biological and clinical aspects of in vitro fertilization]. Frydman N; Hesters L; Fanchin R Rev Prat; 2006 Mar; 56(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 16729541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo quality in in vitro fertilization program. Depa-Martynow M; Jedrzejczak P; Pawelczyk L Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2007; 45 Suppl 1():S85-9. PubMed ID: 18292842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection. Vergouw CG; Botros LL; Roos P; Lens JW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Burns DH; Lambalk CB Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1499-504. PubMed ID: 18424459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative morphometrical characterization of human pronuclear zygotes. Beuchat A; Thévenaz P; Unser M; Ebner T; Senn A; Urner F; Germond M; Sorzano CO Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 18540007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]