595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18191846)
1. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients.
van Casteren NJ; van Santbrink EJ; van Inzen W; Romijn JC; Dohle GR
Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2245-50. PubMed ID: 18191846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens.
Agarwal A; Ranganathan P; Kattal N; Pasqualotto F; Hallak J; Khayal S; Mascha E
Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 14967371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples.
Schmidt KL; Larsen E; Bangsbøll S; Meinertz H; Carlsen E; Andersen AN
Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2806-10. PubMed ID: 15388679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival and infertility treatment in male cancer patients after sperm banking.
Crha I; Ventruba P; Zakova J; Huser M; Kubesova B; Hudecek R; Jarkovsky J
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2344-8. PubMed ID: 18554588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates.
Hourvitz A; Goldschlag DE; Davis OK; Gosden LV; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 18692822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sperm cryopreservation in oncological patients: a 14-year follow-up study.
Meseguer M; Molina N; García-Velasco JA; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Garrido N
Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 16500332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates with cryopreserved sperm from patients with malignant disease.
Revel A; Haimov-Kochman R; Porat A; Lewin A; Simon A; Laufer N; Gino H; Meirow D
Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 16009166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients.
Ragni G; Somigliana E; Restelli L; Salvi R; Arnoldi M; Paffoni A
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(7):1624-9. PubMed ID: 12655518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infertility induced by cancer treatment: inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer.
Mancini J; Rey D; Préau M; Malavolti L; Moatti JP
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18054004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa.
Borges E; Rossi LM; Locambo de Freitas CV; Guilherme P; Bonetti TC; Iaconelli A; Pasqualotto FF
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 17081521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a regional experience.
Neal MS; Nagel K; Duckworth J; Bissessar H; Fischer MA; Portwine C; Tozer R; Barr RD
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 17647219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conservation of sperm before cancer therapy. An efficient measure for preserving chances of future conception].
Auger J; Kuntsmann JM; Czyglik F; Jouannet P
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1993 Oct; 21(10):749-52. PubMed ID: 8269023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female cancer survivors are low responders and have reduced success compared with other patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.
Barton SE; Missmer SA; Berry KF; Ginsburg ES
Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 22177464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above.
Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty years experience with semen cryopreservation in testicular cancer patients: who needs it?
Magelssen H; Haugen TB; von Düring V; Melve KK; Sandstad B; Fosså SD
Eur Urol; 2005 Nov; 48(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 15963629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sperm banking for male reproductive preservation: a 6-year retrospective multi-centre study in China.
Ping P; Zhu WB; Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xu P; Huang YR; Li Z
Asian J Androl; 2010 May; 12(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 20348941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
