These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18191846)
1. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients. van Casteren NJ; van Santbrink EJ; van Inzen W; Romijn JC; Dohle GR Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2245-50. PubMed ID: 18191846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Agarwal A; Ranganathan P; Kattal N; Pasqualotto F; Hallak J; Khayal S; Mascha E Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 14967371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples. Schmidt KL; Larsen E; Bangsbøll S; Meinertz H; Carlsen E; Andersen AN Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2806-10. PubMed ID: 15388679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival and infertility treatment in male cancer patients after sperm banking. Crha I; Ventruba P; Zakova J; Huser M; Kubesova B; Hudecek R; Jarkovsky J Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2344-8. PubMed ID: 18554588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates. Hourvitz A; Goldschlag DE; Davis OK; Gosden LV; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 18692822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sperm cryopreservation in oncological patients: a 14-year follow-up study. Meseguer M; Molina N; García-Velasco JA; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Garrido N Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 16500332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates with cryopreserved sperm from patients with malignant disease. Revel A; Haimov-Kochman R; Porat A; Lewin A; Simon A; Laufer N; Gino H; Meirow D Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 16009166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients. Ragni G; Somigliana E; Restelli L; Salvi R; Arnoldi M; Paffoni A Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(7):1624-9. PubMed ID: 12655518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register. Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L; Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register. Gunby J; Daya S; Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infertility induced by cancer treatment: inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer. Mancini J; Rey D; Préau M; Malavolti L; Moatti JP Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18054004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa. Borges E; Rossi LM; Locambo de Freitas CV; Guilherme P; Bonetti TC; Iaconelli A; Pasqualotto FF Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 17081521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a regional experience. Neal MS; Nagel K; Duckworth J; Bissessar H; Fischer MA; Portwine C; Tozer R; Barr RD Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 17647219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conservation of sperm before cancer therapy. An efficient measure for preserving chances of future conception]. Auger J; Kuntsmann JM; Czyglik F; Jouannet P Contracept Fertil Sex; 1993 Oct; 21(10):749-52. PubMed ID: 8269023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female cancer survivors are low responders and have reduced success compared with other patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Barton SE; Missmer SA; Berry KF; Ginsburg ES Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 22177464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above. Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register. Gunby J; Daya S; Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty years experience with semen cryopreservation in testicular cancer patients: who needs it? Magelssen H; Haugen TB; von Düring V; Melve KK; Sandstad B; Fosså SD Eur Urol; 2005 Nov; 48(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 15963629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles. Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sperm banking for male reproductive preservation: a 6-year retrospective multi-centre study in China. Ping P; Zhu WB; Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xu P; Huang YR; Li Z Asian J Androl; 2010 May; 12(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 20348941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]