These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18192434)

  • 1. Selective attention to signs of success: social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception.
    Maner JK; DeWall CN; Gailliot MT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):488-501. PubMed ID: 18192434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: selective attention to signs of acceptance.
    Dewall CN; Maner JK; Rouby DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 96(4):729-41. PubMed ID: 19309198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ability, luck, and looks: an evolutionary look at achievement ascriptions and the sexual attribution bias.
    Försterling F; Preikschas S; Agthe M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 May; 92(5):775-88. PubMed ID: 17484604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of attractiveness and gender on the perception of achievement-related variables.
    Chia RC; Allred LJ; Grossnickle WF; Lee GW
    J Soc Psychol; 1998 Aug; 138(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 9664863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder.
    Maner JK; Kenrick DT; Becker DV; Delton AW; Hofer B; Wilbur CJ; Neuberg SL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):1107-20. PubMed ID: 14674817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The big, the rich, and the powerful: physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction.
    Bryan AD; Webster GD; Mahaffey AL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Mar; 37(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21252382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
    Montoya RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concentrating on beauty: sexual selection and sociospatial memory.
    Becker DV; Kenrick DT; Guerin S; Maner JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1643-52. PubMed ID: 16254085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals.
    Guimond S; Chatard A; Martinot D; Crisp RJ; Redersdorff S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Feb; 90(2):221-42. PubMed ID: 16536648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within roommate dyads.
    Ansell EB; Kurtz JE; Markey PM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 18340034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model.
    Vescio TK; Snyder M; Butz DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):1062-78. PubMed ID: 14674814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect.
    Johnson SK; Podratz KE; Dipboye RL; Gibbons E
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 20575336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness.
    Hareli S; Shomrat N; Hess U
    Emotion; 2009 Jun; 9(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 19485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effects.
    van Straaten I; Holland RW; Finkenauer C; Hollenstein T; Engels RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19263209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender differences in dominance and affiliation during a demanding interaction.
    Luxen MF
    J Psychol; 2005 Jul; 139(4):331-47. PubMed ID: 16097273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.