These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A computerized system to conduct the Tweed-Merrifield analysis in orthodontics. Barreto MB; Fonseca EM; da Cunha AJ Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16878212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cephalometric analysis in maxillofacial surgery. A proposed computerized cephalometric analysis in lateral projection for study of maxillofacial abnormalities]. Cascone P; De Ponte F; Schaerf M Mondo Ortod; 1987; 12(5):9-28. PubMed ID: 3331719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computers and the orthodontist. Weekes WT Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):47. PubMed ID: 16429860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cephalometric analysis in maxillofacial surgery. A proposed computerized analysis in antero-postero projection for study of maxillofacial abnormalities]. Cascone P; De Ponte F; Schaerf M Mondo Ortod; 1987; 12(6):97-106. PubMed ID: 3331722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients. Wah PL; Cooke MS; Hägg U Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9081997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of facial form modifications in orthodontics: proposal of a modified computerized mesh diagram analysis. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dalloca LL; DeFranco DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 8607471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A computerized measurement of dental relapse following orthognathic surgery. al-Kassab B; Barker GR Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 1820408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of the accuracy of localizing cephalometric reference points in using digital and conventional imaging technique]. Ruppenthal T; Doll G; Sergl HG; Fricke B Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1991 Oct; 52(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 1757019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cephalometric analysis in cases with Class III malocclusions]. Rak D Stomatol Glas Srb; 1989; 36(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 2491173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Development of an analysis system for X-ray cephalometry by Windows platform]. Wang HB; Zhang Y; Chen SP; Hu W; Wang JQ; Yang B; Duan YZ Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Jul; 26(4):259-60, 264. PubMed ID: 16104278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison of reliabilities in dental imaging methods. Krummenauer F J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Jan; 64(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 12557103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]