BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18193311)

  • 1. Comparison of three commercially available radio frequency coils for human brain imaging at 3 Tesla.
    Mekle R; van der Zwaag W; Joosten A; Gruetter R
    MAGMA; 2008 Mar; 21(1-2):53-61. PubMed ID: 18193311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of an eight-element phased array coil in 3 Tesla MR imaging: a basic analysis.
    Hiratsuka Y; Miki H; Kikuchi K; Kiriyama I; Mochizuki T; Takahashi S; Sadamoto K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2007; 6(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18037798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal-to-noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil arrays.
    Pohmann R; Speck O; Scheffler K
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):801-9. PubMed ID: 25820458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of proximity and noise level of phased array coil elements on overall signal-to-noise in parallel MR spectroscopy.
    Fleischer CC; Zhong X; Mao H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():125-130. PubMed ID: 29217493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T.
    Wang C; Shen GX
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 24(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 16786582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated parallel reception, excitation, and shimming (iPRES) with multiple shim loops per radio-frequency coil element for improved B
    Darnell D; Truong TK; Song AW
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 May; 77(5):2077-2086. PubMed ID: 27174387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 Tesla.
    de Zwart JA; Ledden PJ; van Gelderen P; Bodurka J; Chu R; Duyn JH
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jan; 51(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 14705041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-field head radiofrequency volume coils using transverse electromagnetic (TEM) and phased array technologies.
    Avdievich NI; Hetherington HP
    NMR Biomed; 2009 Nov; 22(9):960-74. PubMed ID: 18574792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between 8- and 32-channel phased-array receive coils for in vivo hyperpolarized
    Autry AW; Gordon JW; Carvajal L; Mareyam A; Chen HY; Park I; Mammoli D; Vareth M; Chang SM; Wald LL; Xu D; Vigneron DB; Nelson SJ; Li Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Aug; 82(2):833-841. PubMed ID: 30927300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and testing of a 24-channel head coil for MR imaging at 3 T.
    Li Y; Lee J; Zhang L; Chen Q; Tie C; Luo C; Zhang X; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 58():162-173. PubMed ID: 30684547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monopole antenna array design for 3 T and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kausar ASMZ; Reutens DC; Weber E; Vegh V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214637. PubMed ID: 30933999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A new approach to research graphical performance of MRI RF coil based on the quantitative comparison method].
    Zhu G; Li B; Wei X
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2010 May; 34(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 20812640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3T using a standard quadrature head coil and eight-channel phased-array coil with and without SENSE reconstruction.
    Lupo JM; Lee MC; Han ET; Cha S; Chang SM; Berger MS; Nelson SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 16888776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inverse method to design RF coil arrays optimized for SENSE imaging.
    Muftuler LT; Chen G; Nalcioglu O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6457-69. PubMed ID: 17148829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 16-element phased-array head coil.
    Porter JR; Wright SM; Reykowski A
    Magn Reson Med; 1998 Aug; 40(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 9702709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving quality of arterial spin labeling MR imaging at 3 Tesla with a 32-channel coil and parallel imaging.
    Ferré JC; Petr J; Bannier E; Barillot C; Gauvrit JY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1233-9. PubMed ID: 22246971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly accelerated acquisition and homogeneous image reconstruction with rotating RF coil array at 7T-A phantom based study.
    Li M; Zuo Z; Jin J; Xue R; Trakic A; Weber E; Liu F; Crozier S
    J Magn Reson; 2014 Mar; 240():102-12. PubMed ID: 24365100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 4 T actively detunable transmit/receive transverse electromagnetic coil and 4-channel receive-only phased array for (1)H human brain studies.
    Avdievich NI; Hetherington HP
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Dec; 52(6):1459-64. PubMed ID: 15562466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Black body and transverse electromagnetic resonators operating at 340 MHz: volume RF coils for ultra high field MRI.
    Robitaille PM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(6):879-90. PubMed ID: 10589562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of optimized intensity correction methods for
    Lachner S; Ruck L; Niesporek SC; Utzschneider M; Lott J; Hensel B; Dörfler A; Uder M; Nagel AM
    Z Med Phys; 2020 May; 30(2):104-115. PubMed ID: 31866116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.