These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1819356)

  • 1. Effect of the polishing technique at low or high speed on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Pedigoni Mde L; Centola AL; Froner IC; Turbino ML; Ribeiro SA
    Braz Dent J; 1991; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1819356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of polishing burs and stones on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Ribeiro SA; do Nascimento TN; Centola AL; Teixeira LC; Campos SM
    Braz Dent J; 1992; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 1290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of static flow (CREEP) on amalgam hardness. Effect of alloys and measured areas].
    Glavan PR; da Silva Filho FP; de Sa DN; Rettondini WC; Ababo GL; dos Santos Cruz CA
    RGO; 1990; 38(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 2218050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time.
    Park SH; Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 10842135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Polishing of dental amalgam. Effect of polishing and type of alloy].
    Roxo Piccin DC; Gabrielli F; de Angelis Porto CL; Fernando Fontana U; Machado Candido MS
    RGO; 1987; 35(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 3507040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)].
    Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indentation creep behavior of a direct-filling silver alternative to amalgam.
    Xu HH; Liao H; Eichmiller FC
    J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 77(12):1991-8. PubMed ID: 9839787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Microhardness of margins of amalgam restorations].
    Centola Al; Ribeiro SA; Campos SM; Campos GM; Nonaka T
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1988; 2(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 3079114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.
    van der Merwe WJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.
    de Moraes RR; Marimon JL; Schneider LF; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L; Bueno M
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 18266654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amalgam from high and low silver alloys.
    Shelmerdine AB; Smith DC
    Br Dent J; 1966 Nov; 121(9):407-13. PubMed ID: 5223654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dental amalgam: the influence of immediate polishing on surface hardness, surface rugosity and emission of residual mercury--in vitro study].
    Junho de Araujo MA; Fichman DM; Muench A; Cardoso Villela L
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1988; 29(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 3270952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.