These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18193970)

  • 1. Automatic cephalometric analysis.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Spampinato C
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 18193970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models.
    Vucinić P; Trpovski Z; Sćepan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 20203126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria.
    Tanikawa C; Yagi M; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A technique for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis as an aid in evaluating changes in the craniofacial skeleton.
    Haffner CL; Pessa JE; Zadoo VP; Garza JR
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 10456602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faciometrics: a new syntax for facial feature analysis.
    El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA; Rasmy EM; Salah A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 9046629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Ye H; Cheng Z; Ungvijanpunya N; Chen W; Cao L; Gou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37422630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Development of automatic cephalometric analysis by image processing. Automatic extraction of landmarks].
    Ishikawa H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Mar; 46(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 3506550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stability of anatomical and centroid reference points in cephalometric analysis.
    Trenouth MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 2596750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The study of automatic cephalometric analysis system].
    Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 34(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11834164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active testing for face detection and localization.
    Sznitman R; Jedynak B
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Oct; 32(10):1914-20. PubMed ID: 20479494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The improbability of harris interest points.
    Loog M; Lauze F
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Jun; 32(6):1141-7. PubMed ID: 20431138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of a commercially available digitizer: a new method for assessment of errors in linearity.
    Tourne LP
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 8974179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
    Cohen JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
    Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided automated landmarking of cephalograms.
    Stamm T; Brinkhaus HA; Ehmer U; Meier N; Bollmann F
    J Orofac Orthop; 1998; 59(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 9577102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.