378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18194063)
1. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
White PA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structure and strength in causal induction.
Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
Cogn Psychol; 2005 Dec; 51(4):334-84. PubMed ID: 16168981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
White PA
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
White PA
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
White PA
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
Perales JC; Shanks DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
Macho S; Burkart J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
Matute H; Vegas S; De Marez PJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy.
Mandel DR; Vartanian O
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies.
Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: effects of relative prevalence of the two causes.
White P
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):961-91. PubMed ID: 15370512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of causal models in analogical inference.
Lee HS; Holyoak KJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1111-22. PubMed ID: 18763895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
Vadillo MA; Matute H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
