These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18194063)

  • 21. Competition between multiple causes of a single outcome in causal reasoning.
    Darredeau C; Baetu I; Baker AG; Murphy RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 19159158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.
    Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):330-55. PubMed ID: 17366304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
    Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian generic priors for causal learning.
    Lu H; Yuille AL; Liljeholm M; Cheng PW; Holyoak KJ
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):955-84. PubMed ID: 18954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relative effect of cue interaction.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 12881163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: a coherence hypothesis.
    Lien Y; Cheng PW
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Mar; 40(2):87-137. PubMed ID: 10716875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human judgments of positive and negative causal chains.
    Baetu I; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 19364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selectional processes in causality judgment.
    Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 2913454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aging and the detection of contingency in causal learning.
    Mutter SA; Williams TW
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 15065928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions.
    Kushnir T; Gopnik A
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17201518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How causal knowledge affects classification: A generative theory of categorization.
    Rehder B; Kim S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):659-83. PubMed ID: 16822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.