365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18194067)
1. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
Eagan DE; Chein JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
Marsh JE; Jones DM
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
Saito S; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modality effects in sentence recall.
Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping.
Surprenant AM; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Allbritton DW
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 18778142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
Hughes RW; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
Steinbrink C; Klatte M
Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
Coltheart V
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
Neely CB; LeCompte DC
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
