These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18194387)

  • 1. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Feb; 48(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 18005330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical considerations in meta-analysis.
    Barza M; Trikalinos TA; Lau J
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):195-210, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advancing research through systematic reviews and meta-analysis: workshop experience.
    Alam AY; Zaidi Z; Rahim F; Qureshi AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 18541096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
    Thoma A; Eaves FF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1198-1201. PubMed ID: 27756743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.
    Thomas J; Harden A; Oakley A; Oliver S; Sutcliffe K; Rees R; Brunton G; Kavanagh J
    BMJ; 2004 Apr; 328(7446):1010-2. PubMed ID: 15105329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Khan KS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice.
    Schriger DL; Altman DG; Vetter JA; Heafner T; Moher D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 39(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 20093305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.