154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18194406)
1. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population.
Lee BB; King MT; Simpson JM; Haran MJ; Stockler MR; Marial O; Salkeld G
Value Health; 2008; 11(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 18194406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury.
Lee BB; Simpson JM; King MT; Haran MJ; Marial O
Spinal Cord; 2009 Jan; 47(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 18560375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.
Walters SJ; Brazier JE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Apr; 1():4. PubMed ID: 12737635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring psychometric properties of the SF-6D, a preference-based health-related quality of life measure, in the context of spinal cord injury.
Engel L; Bryan S; Evers SM; Dirksen CD; Noonan VK; Whitehurst DG
Qual Life Res; 2014 Oct; 23(8):2383-93. PubMed ID: 24700379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.
Walters SJ; Brazier JE
Qual Life Res; 2005 Aug; 14(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16110932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis.
Khanna D; Furst DE; Wong WK; Tsevat J; Clements PJ; Park GS; Postlethwaite AE; Ahmed M; Ginsburg S; Hays RD;
Qual Life Res; 2007 Aug; 16(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17404896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility.
Lee L; Elfassy N; Li C; Latimer E; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Carli F; Fried GM; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23522456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The SF-6D health utility index in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Atroshi I; Gummesson C; McCabe SJ; Ornstein E
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Apr; 32(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 17223234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health status rated with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey after spinal cord injury.
Haran MJ; Lee BB; King MT; Marial O; Stockler MR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2290-5. PubMed ID: 16344025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D.
Norman R; Church J; van den Berg B; Goodall S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Feb; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23379801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI.
Carreon LY; Berven SH; Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 22648033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of utility measures for women with urge, stress, and mixed urinary incontinence.
Harvie HS; Shea JA; Andy UU; Propert K; Schwartz JS; Arya LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):85.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24055585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
