211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18195646)
1. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire advanced: item and test score characteristics, 4-factor solution, and severity classification.
Bodenburg S; Dopslaff N
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Jan; 196(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18195646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) in Alzheimer's disease: validation of a behavioral rating scale to assess dysexecutive symptoms in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Shinagawa Y; Nakaaki S; Hongo J; Murata Y; Sato J; Matsui T; Tatsumi H; Akechi T; Furukawa TA
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 22(10):951-6. PubMed ID: 17299806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample.
Wood RL; Liossi C
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Aug; 21(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 16879945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it bigger than a breadbox? Performance of patients with prefrontal lesions on a new executive function test.
Baldo JV; Delis DC; Wilkins DP; Shimamura AP
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 15033225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Traumatic brain injury, cognitive and emotional dysfunction. Impact of clinical neuropsychology research.
Emilien G; Waltregny A
Acta Neurol Belg; 1996 Jun; 96(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 8711991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dysexecutive symptoms among a non-clinical sample: a study with the use of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire.
Chan RC
Br J Psychol; 2001 Aug; 92(Pt 3):551-65. PubMed ID: 11534744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain injured patients versus multiple trauma patients: some neurobehavioral and psychopathological aspects.
Frénisy MC; Bénony H; Chahraoui K; Minot D; d'Athis P; Pinoit JM; Freysz M
J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):1018-26. PubMed ID: 16688064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring unawareness of deficits among patients with traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the Patient Competency Rating Scale--Hebrew version.
Hoofien D; Sharoni L
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 17338451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [NeuroCogFX--a computer-based neuropsychological assessment battery for the follow-up examination of neurological patients].
Fliessbach K; Hoppe C; Schlegel U; Elger CE; Helmstaedter C
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2006 Nov; 74(11):643-50. PubMed ID: 17103364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prefrontal symptoms assessment: psychometric properties and normative data of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) in a sample from the Spanish population].
Pedrero-Pérez EJ; Ruiz-Sánchez de León JM; Lozoya-Delgado P; Llanero-Luque M; Rojo-Mota G; Puerta-García C
Rev Neurol; 2011 Apr; 52(7):394-404. PubMed ID: 21425108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of measures and their relationship to executive functions.
Bogod NM; Mateer CA; MacDonald SW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Mar; 9(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 12666769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Huntington's disease patients have selective problems with insight.
Ho AK; Robbins AO; Barker RA
Mov Disord; 2006 Mar; 21(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 16211608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Ratings by patients with brain injury and their therapists.
Emmanouel A; Mouza E; Kessels RP; Fasotti L
Brain Inj; 2014; 28(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 25121459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecological assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome using execution of a cooking task.
Chevignard MP; Taillefer C; Picq C; Poncet F; Noulhiane M; Pradat-Diehl P
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):461-85. PubMed ID: 18576272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecological validity of the Multiple Errands Test using predictive models of dysexecutive problems in everyday life.
Cuberos-Urbano G; Caracuel A; Vilar-López R; Valls-Serrano C; Bateman A; Verdejo-García A
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23458357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Factorial structure of the dysexecutive questionnaire in a sample of the Spanish population with acquired brain injury and memory deficit complaints].
Luna-Lario P; Seijas-Gómez R; Tirapu-Ustárroz J; Hernáez-Goñi P; Mata-Pastor I
Rev Neurol; 2012 Dec; 55(11):641-50. PubMed ID: 23172090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensions of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) examined using Rasch analysis.
Simblett SK; Bateman A
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2011 Jan; 21(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 21181602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Social inappropriateness, executive control, and aging.
Henry JD; von Hippel W; Baynes K
Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):239-44. PubMed ID: 19290759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
