BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18196552)

  • 1. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
    John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
    Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
    John SK; Jones OM; Horseman N; Thomas P; Howell RD; Fozard JB
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 17854292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Same-day assessment and management of urgent (2-week wait) colorectal referrals: an analysis of the outcome of 1606 patients attending an endoscopy unit-based colorectal clinic.
    Royle TJ; Ferguson HJ; Mak TW; Simpson JA; Thumbe V; Bhalerao S
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):O176-81. PubMed ID: 24299144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.
    Rai S; Kelly MJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Mar; 9(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 17298615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
    Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strengths and weaknesses of electronic referral: comparison of data content and clinical value of electronic and paper referrals in dermatology.
    Shaw LJ; de Berker DA
    Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):223-4. PubMed ID: 17359610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations in the evaluation of colorectal cancer risk.
    Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 15859964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.
    Rai S; Ballal M; Thomas WM; Miller AS; Jameson JS; Steward WP
    Br J Surg; 2008 Mar; 95(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17932877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
    Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls in the construction of cancer guidelines demonstrated by the analyses of colorectal referrals.
    Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 16263008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer.
    Ryan AV; Wilson S; Wakelam MJ; Warmington SA; Dunn JA; Hobbs RF; Martin A; Ismail T
    BMC Cancer; 2006 Oct; 6():251. PubMed ID: 17059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is anaemia relevant in the referral and diagnosis of colorectal cancer?
    Masson S; Chinn DJ; Tabaqchali MA; Waddup G; Dwarakanath AD
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):736-9. PubMed ID: 17854293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Straight to flexible sigmoidoscopy: rationalization of 2-week wait referrals in suspected colorectal cancer.
    Couch DG; Murphy JH; Boyle KM; Hemingway DM
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov; 17(11):980-3. PubMed ID: 25944142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of left-sided colorectal cancer and benefit of flexible sigmoidoscopy: a county hospital experience.
    Kumar RR; King J; Holt A; Huynh R; Mittal R; Deen R; Kim J
    Am Surg; 2007 Oct; 73(10):994-7. PubMed ID: 17983066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of referral practice to a fast-access breast clinic before the guaranteed 2-week wait.
    Khawaja AR; Allan SM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11212454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeat 2-week wait referrals for colorectal cancer.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cutting JE; Borley NR; Wheeler JM
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22776207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An effective electronic surgical referral system.
    Dennison J; Eisen S; Towers M; Ingham Clark C
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Oct; 88(6):554-6. PubMed ID: 17059716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial comparing consultant-led or open access investigation for large bowel symptoms.
    MacKenzie S; Norrie J; Vella M; Drummond I; Walker A; Molloy R; Galloway DJ; O'Dwyer PJ
    Br J Surg; 2003 Aug; 90(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 12905545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of a rapid referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer in Madrid.
    Valentín-López B; Ferrándiz-Santos J; Blasco-Amaro JA; Morillas-Sáinz JD; Ruiz-López P
    Fam Pract; 2012 Apr; 29(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21976660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.